Why the study?
This review addresses treatment options for moderate to severe tricuspid valve regurgitation and the importance of right ventricular function and the pulmonary circulation.
What are the treatment options for moderate to severe tricuspid valve regurgitation and the importance of right ventricular function and pulmonary circulation?
What are the treatment options for moderate to severe tricuspid valve regurgitation and the importance of right ventricular function and pulmonary circulation?
Right ventricular dysfunction and abnormal pulmonary hemodynamics are important determinants of procedural success and clinical outcome in interventional treatment of severe tricuspid regurgitation.
Transcatheter options for severe tricuspid regurgitation show high procedural success; leaves open optimal patient selection and durability in randomized trials.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review addresses treatment options for moderate to severe tricuspid valve regurgitation and the importance of right ventricular function and the pulmonary circulation. RECENT FINDINGS: Several interventional treatment options for severe tricuspid regurgitation have been developed including transcatheter edge-to-edge repair, annuloplasty and valve replacement. So far, transcatheter edge-to-edge repair is most frequently used with procedural success rates of more than 95% and improvements in functional and quality of life parameters for up to 2 years. Right ventricular function as well as pulmonary artery pressure and resistance levels are important outcome predictors. Mean pulmonary artery pressure more than 30 mmHg, transpulmonary gradient more than 17 mmHg and right ventricular to pulmonary artery coupling ratio less than 0.406 indicate poor outcome. SUMMARY: Despite the remarkable safety of interventional treatment of severe tricuspid regurgitation right ventricular dysfunction and abnormal pulmonary hemodynamics are important determinants of procedural success and clinical outcome.Complete hemodynamic work-up should be an integral part of prerepair assessment although validated data predicting outcome are limited.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wensel et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: