Why the study?
With the increasing prevalence of inflammatory bowel disease, lack of effective treatment, and unknown etiology, proteomic and lipidomic studies have identified markers that may improve diagnosis and treatment monitoring.
Can proteomic and lipidomic biomarkers improve the diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment of inflammatory bowel disease?
Can proteomic and lipidomic biomarkers improve the diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment of inflammatory bowel disease?
Proteomic and lipidomic biomarkers show potential for improving the diagnosis, monitoring, and targeted treatment of inflammatory bowel disease, though further research is needed to identify the most sensitive and specific markers.
Proteomic and lipidomic markers may aid IBD diagnosis and monitoring; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
PURPOSE: There is an increasing prevalence of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and to date, no effective treatment has been developed and the exact etiology of this disease remains unknown. Nevertheless, a growing number of proteomic and lipidomic studies have identified certain proteins and lipids which can be used successfully in patients to improve diagnoses and monitoring of treatment. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We have focused on the applications of proteins and lipids for IBD diagnostics, including differentiation of Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), treatment monitoring, monitoring of clinical state, likelihood of relapse, and their potential for novel targeted treatments. RESULTS: Analysis of protein and lipid profiles can: improve the availability and use of diagnostic markers; improve understanding of the pathomechanisms of IBD, for example, several studies have implicated platelet dysfunction (PF4), autoimmune responses (granzyme B, perforin), and abnormal metabolism (arachidonic acid pathways); aid in monitoring patient health; and improve therapeutics (experimental phosphatidylcholine therapy has been shown to result in an improvement in intestinal condition). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the enormous progress of proteomics and lipidomics in recent years and the development of new technologies, further research is needed to select some of the most sensitive and specific markers applicable in diagnosing and treating IBD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cecerska‐Heryć et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: