Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Purpose: This study uses projective techniques to explore how consumers perceive private labels and provides retailers with actionable findings for developing successful private label strategies. Design/Methodology: The research employed a qualitative design using two projective techniques, word association and a combined sentence completion and role-playing task, on a sample of 98 graduate students from the University of Zagreb. Findings: Projective techniques help uncover how consumers evaluate private labels by using a rational risk–reward analysis based on price and quality. Spontaneous associations confirm that price and affordability remain the primary mental triggers, but the decision to purchase is a value-driven substitution, frequently rationalized as receiving “equal quality at a lower price”. The study establishes a strong link between private labels and the retailer’s identity. Practical Implications: From a managerial perspective, the results indicate that retailers must move beyond simple low-price positioning and focus on communicating superior value and tangible savings. Managers should address quality polarization by actively improving product quality, cooperating with local suppliers, and using explicit quality-assurance claims to mitigate perceived risk. At the same time, they should recognize that confidence in private labels is fundamentally tied to the retailer’s image. Originality/Value: What is new in this study is the use of projective techniques in this context, which leads to several specific implications for retailers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sandra Horvat (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: