Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Earlier (Wainer & Lewis, 1990), we reported the initial development of a testlet‐based algebra test. In this account, we provide the details of this excursion into the use of testlets. A pretest of two 15–item algebra tests was carried out in which examinees' performance on a 4‐item subset of each test (a 4–item testlet) was used to predict performance on the entire test. Two models for constructing the testlets were considered: hierarchical (adaptive) and linear (fixed format). These models are compared with each other. It was found on cross–validation that, although an adaptive testlet is superior to a fixed format testlet, this superiority is modest, whereas the potential cost of that superiority is considerable. It was concluded that in circumstances similar to those we report a fixed format testlet that uses the best items in a pool can do almost as well as the optimal adaptive testlet of equal length from that same pool.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wainer et al. (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: