Why the study?
Does conventional X-ray analysis accurately detect pin penetration following in situ pinning of slipped capital femoral epiphysis?
Does conventional X-ray analysis accurately detect pin penetration following in situ pinning of slipped capital femoral epiphysis?
Conventional X-ray analysis is limited in accurately determining pin position after in situ pinning of slipped capital femoral epiphysis, leading to a high rate of unrecognized pin penetration.
Conventional X-rays may miss pin penetration after SCFE pinning; supports prospective validation of fluoroscopy protocols.
Over a 3-year follow-up period, 63 hips (in 49 patients) that were pinned as treatment for slipped capital femoral epiphysis were examined and evaluated. A 36.8% incidence of unsuspected pin penetration was discovered. Four types of experimental models representing different degrees of severity of slipped capital femoral epiphysis were designed and manufactured in the bioengineering laboratory. In situ pinning was performed on each model. An extensive series of controlled test films on the models indicated the difficulty of accurately determining the true position of the pins with conventional roentgenographic views. Subsequent fluoroscopic analysis revealed a verifiable correlation between the limited visualization of conventional X-ray analysis following the pinning of a slipped capital femoral epiphysis and unrecognized pin penetration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lehman et al. (1984) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: