Case-Control
Yes
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We construct risk predictors using polygenic scores (PGS) computed from common Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) for a number of complex disease conditions, using L1-penalized regression (also known as LASSO) on case-control data from UK Biobank. Among the disease conditions studied are Hypothyroidism, (Resistant) Hypertension, Type 1 and 2 Diabetes, Breast Cancer, Prostate Cancer, Testicular Cancer, Gallstones, Glaucoma, Gout, Atrial Fibrillation, High Cholesterol, Asthma, Basal Cell Carcinoma, Malignant Melanoma, and Heart Attack. We obtain values for the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) in the range ~0.58-0.71 using SNP data alone. Substantially higher predictor AUCs are obtained when incorporating additional variables such as age and sex. Some SNP predictors alone are sufficient to identify outliers (e.g., in the 99th percentile of polygenic score, or PGS) with 3-8 times higher risk than typical individuals. We validate predictors out-of-sample using the eMERGE dataset, and also with different ancestry subgroups within the UK Biobank population. Our results indicate that substantial improvements in predictive power are attainable using training sets with larger case populations. We anticipate rapid improvement in genomic prediction as more case-control data become available for analysis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lello et al. (2019) conducted a case-control in 16 complex diseases including heart attack, diabetes, breast and prostate cancer. Polygenic scores (PGS) computed from common SNPs using L1-penalized regression (LASSO) vs. Typical individuals (vs. 99th percentile of PGS) was evaluated on Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for disease prediction and relative risk in top PGS outliers (AUC 0.58-0.71 (SNP alone); 3-8x higher risk in 99th percentile).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: