Why the study?
While conventional imaging focuses on morphological features, modern CT, MR, and PET advancements offer opportunities to evaluate vessel wall biology, composition, and metabolic state to improve cardiovascular risk prediction.
Modern multimodality imaging techniques and novel tracers offer the potential to move beyond simple morphological assessment of atherosclerosis to evaluate plaque metabolic activity and improve risk prediction.
Advances in CT/MR/PET resolution may broaden atherosclerosis assessment; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Atherosclerosis is a chronic immunomodulated disease that affects multiple vascular beds and results in a significant worldwide disease burden. Conventional imaging modalities focus on the morphological features of atherosclerotic disease such as the degree of stenosis caused by a lesion. Modern CT, MR and positron emission tomography scanners have seen significant improvements in the rapidity of image acquisition and spatial resolution. This has increased the scope for the clinical application of these modalities. Multimodality imaging can improve cardiovascular risk prediction by informing on the constituency and metabolic processes within the vessel wall. Specific disease processes can be targeted using novel biological tracers and smart contrast agents. These approaches have the potential to inform clinicians of the metabolic state of atherosclerotic plaque. This review will provide an overview of current imaging techniques for the imaging of atherosclerosis and how various modalities can provide information that enhances the depiction of basic morphology. This publication is the reprint with Russian translation from original: Syed MB, Fletcher AJ, Forsythe RO, Kaczynski J, Newby DE, Dweck MR, van Beek EJ. Emerging techniques in atherosclerosis imaging. Br J Radiol. 2019;92(1103):20180309. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20180309.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Syed et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: