Why the study?
Does the Surgical Apgar Score (SAS) predict complications and length of stay in patients undergoing esophagectomy?
Does the Surgical Apgar Score (SAS) predict complications and length of stay in patients undergoing esophagectomy?
The Surgical Apgar Score is a significant predictor of complications, mortality, and length of stay following esophagectomy, and may help prioritize critical care resources.
May aid postoperative risk stratification after esophagectomy; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical use.
BACKGROUND: Esophagectomy carries considerable morbidity. Many studies have evaluated factors to predict patients at risk. This study aimed to determine whether the surgical Apgar score (SAS) predicts complications and length of stay (LOS) for patients undergoing esophagectomy. STUDY DESIGN: We evaluated 212 patients undergoing esophagectomy. Postoperative complications were graded using the Clavien-Dindo scale and the SAS was determined. Association of SAS with incidence of complications was evaluated using the Cochran-Armitage trend test between grouped SAS scores (0-2, 3-4, 5-6, 7-8, 9-10) and each of the outcomes. Correlation of SAS with LOS was evaluated using competing risks proportional hazards regression. RESULTS: The average patient age was 63.5 years (range 31-86), and the average blood loss was 284 mL (range 50-4000). The median LOS was 10 days. There was a significant association between SAS and grade 2 or higher (P = 0.0002) and grade 3 or higher (P < 0.0001) complications. The perioperative mortality rate was 5.2% (n = 11) with lower SAS being associated with greater mortality. LOS was also associated with SAS (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate that SAS is a significant predictor of complications and LOS for patients undergoing esophagectomy. SAS should be used to identify lower risk patients to prioritize use of critical care beds and hospital resources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Giugliano et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: