Why the study?
Trastuzumab treatment is associated with cardiotoxicity, but whether it can be safely administered to patients who develop an EF < 50% remains poorly understood.
Does a cardioncological approach improve adherence to trastuzumab therapy and clinical outcomes in breast cancer patients with cardiotoxicity compared to standard care?
Does a cardioncological approach improve adherence to trastuzumab therapy and clinical outcomes in breast cancer patients with cardiotoxicity compared to standard care?
A targeted cardioncological approach allows for the safe continuation of trastuzumab therapy in breast cancer patients who develop cardiotoxicity, improving oncological adherence and cardiovascular outcomes.
May enable trastuzumab continuation after LVEF drop with cardio-oncology input; leaves open need for randomized trials before practice change.
Background Treatment with Trastuzumab is associated with cardiotoxicity. If Trastuzumab could be administered in a safe manner to patients who develop a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) of < 50% remains poorly understood. Objective To evaluate the impact of a cardioncological approach in terms of adherence and continuation of oncological therapy with Trastuzumab. Methods and Results Internal databases of candidates for trastuzumab chemotherapy with evidence of cardiotoxicity according to echocardiographic criteria were retrospectively evaluated. Eighty-four female patients (age 51.7 years, 95% CI 49.5 – 53.8), were finally included. Patients were divided to receive a standard (n 27) or cardioncological (n 57) scheme. Baseline EF values were within normal limits (60.9, 95% CI 60 - 61.9%; p=0.5 between groups). The nadir of EF observed during trastuzumab therapy was more pronounced in the standard care group (40.6, 95% CI 37.3 - 43.9% vs. 46.3, 95% CI 44.3 - 48.3%; p=0.002). At re-challenge, after cardiotoxicity detection, all patients in the cardioncological arm resumed and completed trastuzumab therapy (p<0.0001). An overall reduction of EF was observed at the final evaluation (p <0.0001 vs baseline). Cardioncological approach was the only independent determinant of ΔEF from baseline to final evaluation (R20.12; p=0.004). We observed a total of 13 (15%) HF events, 7 (26%) in the standard and 6 (10%) in the cardioncological approach group (p =0.1). Patients in the cardioncological approach arm had a better outcome (Log Rank Chi-squared 4.89; p=0.02). Conclusions A targeted cardioncological approach, in patients with evidence of cardiotoxicity during HER-2 inhibitor therapy, could favorably influence the oncological management of breast cancer patients, reducing the adverse cardiovascular impact of chemotherapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fabiani et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: