Why the study?
Care home residents face high risk of medication-related harm during care transitions, but no intervention has been identified to support safe transitions following hospital discharge.
What factors influence the impact of medicines-related interventions to support safe transitions for care home residents post hospital discharge?
What factors influence the impact of medicines-related interventions to support safe transitions for care home residents post hospital discharge?
This systematic review and meta-ethnography developed a conceptual model to understand contextual factors influencing medicines-related interventions for care home residents post-discharge.
Highlights contextual factors shaping medicines interventions in care home transitions; leaves open optimal multicomponent model testing in trials.
BACKGROUND: Residents of care or nursing homes are at a higher risk of medication-related harm, especially during care transitions. No medicines-related intervention has been identified that supports the safe transition for these residents moving into their residence following hospital discharge. A model of care integrating a number of intervention components is suggested to be most effective AIM: To investigate, via a systematic review and meta-ethnography, the factors which influence the impact of medicines related interventions. METHOD: In December 2020, Pubmed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and CINAHL Complete were systematically searched. All studies reporting on medicines-related interventions for residents following hospital discharge were included. Quality assessment was undertaken with a validated tool. Meta-ethnography was used to investigate the factors which influenced how interventions did, or did not work. Findings were mapped to a validated conceptual framework for integrated care. RESULTS: From 3884 studies, nine met the inclusion criteria and were analysed. These were generally of medium quality (n = 6). The interventions were diverse: some tackled the transition process, some tackled follow-up care and some interventions involved both. The meta-ethnography, using the a priori conceptual framework, captured factors reported within the studies that influenced implementation, delivery and/or outcomes. CONCLUSION: The review and synthesis informed the development of a conceptual model for transitionary care for this population group. Researchers and decision-makers can use this as a tool to understand their local context and inform future intervention design, implementation and evaluation in this clinical area.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kandiah et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: