This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is common and associated with high patient mortality, and accelerated progression to chronic kidney disease. Our ability to diagnose and stratify patients with AKI is paramount for translational progress. Unfortunately, currently available methods have major pitfalls. Serum creatinine is an insensitive functional biomarker of AKI, slow to register the event and influenced by multiple variables. Cystatin C, a proposed alternative, requires long laboratory processing and also lacks specificity. Other techniques are either very cumbersome (inuline, iohexol) or involve administration of radioactive products, and are therefore, not applicable on a large scale. RECENT FINDINGS: The development of two optical measurement techniques utilizing novel minimally invasive techniques to quantify kidney function, independent of serum or urinary measurements is advancing. Utilization of both one and two compartmental models, as well as continuous monitoring, are being developed. SUMMARY: The clinical utility of rapid GFR measurements in AKI patients remains unknown as these disruptive technologies have not been tested in studies exploring clinical outcomes. However, these approaches have the potential to improve our understanding of AKI and clinical care. This overdue technology has the potential to individualize patient care and foster therapeutic success in AKI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schneider et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: