Why the study?
Does short-term radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure affect heart rate variability and autonomic nervous system activity in healthy adolescent students?
Does short-term radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure affect heart rate variability and autonomic nervous system activity in healthy adolescent students?
Short-term radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure increases parasympathetic nerve activity and decreases heart rate in healthy adolescents while lying down.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
RF EMF may alter HRV in adolescents; leaves open clinical relevance and requires larger randomized confirmation.
This study examines the possible effect of radiofrequency (RF) electromagnetic fields (EMF) on the autonomic nervous system (ANS). The effect of RF EMF on ANS activity was studied by measuring heart rate variability (HRV) during ortho‐clinostatic test (i.e., transition from lying to standing and back) in 46 healthy grammar school students. A 1788 MHz pulsed wave with intensity of 54 ± 1.6 V/m was applied intermittently for 18 min in each trial. Maximum specific absorption rate (SAR 10 ) value was determined to 0.405 W/kg. We also measured the respiration rate and estimated a subjective perception of EMF exposure. RF exposure decreased heart rate of subjects in a lying position, while no such change was seen in standing students. After exposure while lying, a rise in high frequency band of HRV and root Mean Square of the Successive Differences was observed, which indicated an increase in parasympathetic nerve activity. Tympanic temperature and skin temperature were measured showing no heating under RF exposure. No RF effect on respiration rate was observed. None of the tested subjects were able to distinguish real exposure from sham exposure when queried at the end of the trial. In conclusion, short‐term RF EMF exposure of students in a lying position during the ortho‐clinostatic test affected ANS with significant increase in parasympathetic nerve activity compared to sham exposed group. Bioelectromagnetics. 39:277–288, 2018.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Míšek et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: