Why the study?
The study was conducted to evaluate the reproducibility of 24-segment fractional shortening of the fetal heart using speckle-tracking and to assess changes with advancing gestation.
FetalHQ speckle-tracking provides fair reproducibility for measuring 24-segment fractional shortening in fetal hearts, revealing significant changes with advancing gestational age.
Hypothesis-generating for fetal speckle-tracking FS; leaves open clinical utility pending validation studies.
OBJECTIVES: HQ by speckle-tracking regarding reproducibility and the change with advancing gestation. METHODS: HQ with the speckle-tracking technique to calculate 24-segment FS of left and right ventricles. Intra- and inter-class correlation coefficients and intra- and inter-observer agreements of measurements for FS were assessed in each segment. RESULTS: With respect to intra-observer reproducibility, all FS values showed correlations between 0.575 and 0.862 for the left ventricle, with good intra-observer agreements except for left ventricular segments 14-24. Right ventricular FS values showed correlations between 0.334 and 0.685, with good intra-observer agreements. With respect to inter-observer reproducibility, all FS values showed correlations between 0.491 and 0.801 for the left ventricle, with good intra-observer agreements except for left ventricular segments 16-22. Right ventricular FS values showed correlations between 0.375 and 0.575, with good inter-observer agreements. There were significant differences in the mean FS values in the basal segment (segments 1-5) of the left ventricle between 18 and 21+6 and 28-31+6 weeks of gestation (p<0.05), whereas there were significant differences in all mean FS values in the right ventricle between both gestational ages (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: HQ is fair. However, there may be significant differences in FS values with advancing gestational age, especially for the right ventricle.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hata et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: