Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Previous studies have shown that activation of NF-kappaB can inhibit apoptosis induced by a number of stimuli. It is also known that TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) can activate NF-kappaB through the death receptors TRAIL-R1 and TRAIL-R2, and decoy receptor TRAIL-R4. In view of these findings, we have investigated the extent to which activation of NF-kappaB may account for the variable responses of melanoma lines to apoptosis induced by TRAIL and other TNF family members. Pretreatment of the melanoma lines with the proteasome inhibitor N-acetyl-L-leucinyl-L-leucinyl-L-norleucinal (LLnL), which is known to inhibit activation of NF-kappaB, was shown to markedly increase apoptosis in 10 of 12 melanoma lines with death receptors for TRAIL. The specificity of results for inhibition of NF-kappaB activation was supported by an increase of TRAIL-induced apoptosis in melanoma cells transfected with a degradation-resistant IkappaBalpha. Furthermore, studies with NF-kappaB reporter constructs revealed that the resistance of melanoma lines to TRAIL-induced apoptosis was correlated to activation of NF-kappaB in response to TRAIL. TRAIL-resistant sublines that were generated by intermittent exposure to TRAIL were shown to have high levels of activated NF-kappaB, and resistance to TRAIL could be reversed by LLnL and by the superrepressor form of IkappaBalpha. Therefore, these results suggest that activation of NF-kappaB by TRAIL plays an important role in resistance of melanoma cells to TRAIL-induced apoptosis and further suggest that inhibitors of NF-kappaB may be useful adjuncts in clinical use of TRAIL against melanoma.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Franco et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: