Why the study?
Does high-intensity endurance exercise training alter left and right ventricular mechanics in previously untrained subjects?
Does high-intensity endurance exercise training alter left and right ventricular mechanics in previously untrained subjects?
High-intensity endurance exercise training in previously untrained subjects leads to significant alterations in resting LV and RV mechanics, including reduced apical contractility and increased basal rotation, which may represent a protective mechanism to reduce myocardial stress.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Endurance training-associated ventricular strain reductions warrant caution in athlete strain interpretation; leaves open whether adaptive or clinically relevant.
BACKGROUND: Functional adaptation of the heart to regular strenuous exercise has not been fully elucidated yet, with different patterns of alterations being reported. We evaluated the effect of endurance exercise training (EET) on left (LV) and right ventricular (RV) mechanics in amateur individuals preparing for triathlon competitions. METHODS: Twenty-one subjects aged 33 ± 6 years underwent conventional and speckle tracking echocardiography at rest before and after a high-intensity (12.3 ± 1.0 h/week) 12-month EET. RESULTS: At follow-up, in addition to the improvement in LV diastolic parameters, a significant decrease in longitudinal (26.0 ± 3.3% vs. 24.3 ± 3.2%, P < 0.04), circumferential (24.3 ±4.3% vs. 20.1 ± 3.8%, P < 0.002), and radial strains (46.8 ± 18.3% vs. 37.8 ± 12.9%, P < 0.03), and rotation (9.7 ± 4.8% vs. 7.1 ± 4.0 deg, P < 0.04) was demonstrated at the apex, whereas the LV base was found to show an increase in rotation (-3.9 ± 2.8% vs. -5.9 ± 1.8 deg, P < 0.01). Overall hemodynamic effectiveness of the LV was preserved, as evidenced by the unchanged ejection fraction, cardiac output, twist, and torsion. RV systolic function as assessed by strain was significantly reduced with EET (28.1 ± 6.7% vs. 23.7 ± 8.6%, P < 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: EET modifies both LV and RV performance at rest in previously untrained subjects. The true nature of these changes (adaptive or maladaptive) is unclear, but the hypothesis of different responses of the LV apex and base, with the reduction in contractility of the former and increase in rotation of the latter, representing a protective mechanism that reduces myocardial stress might be considered.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rojek et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: