Why the study?
Is elevated high-sensitive troponin I or NT-proBNP associated with an increased calculated 5-year risk of sudden cardiac death in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy?
Is elevated high-sensitive troponin I or NT-proBNP associated with an increased calculated 5-year risk of sudden cardiac death in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy?
Elevated high-sensitive troponin I, but not NT-proBNP, is associated with a higher calculated 5-year risk of sudden cardiac death in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
Supports biomarker exploration for SCD risk stratification in HCM; leaves open validation before any clinical adoption.
The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between biomarkers (high-sensitive troponin I [hs-TnI], N-Terminal probrain natriuretic peptide [NT-proBNP]) and calculated 5-year percentage risk score of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). Methods . In 46 HCM patients (mean age 39 ± 7 years, 24 males and 22 females), echocardiographic examination, including the stimulating maneuvers to provoke maximized LVOT gradient, had been performed and next ECG Holter was immediately started. After 24 hours, the ECG Holter was finished and the hs-TnI and NT-proBNP have been measured. Patients were divided according to 1/value of both biomarkers (hs-TnI-positive and hs-TnI-negative subgroups) and 2/(NT-proBNP lower and higher subgroup divided by median). Results . In comparison between 19 patients (hs-TnI positive) versus 27 patients (hs-TnI negative), the calculated 5-year percentage risk of SCD in HCM was significantly greater (6.38 ± 4.17% versus 3.81 ± 3.23%, P<0.05). In comparison between higher NT-proBNP versus lower NT-proBNP subgroups, the calculated 5-year percentage risk of SCD in HCM was not significantly greater (5.18 ± 3.63% versus 4.14 ± 4.18%, P>0.05). Conclusions . Patients with HCM and positive hs-TnI test have a higher risk of SCD estimated according to SCD calculator recommended by the ESC Guidelines 2014 than patients with negative hs-TnI test.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rajtar-Salwa et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: