Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence and nature of asthma in four rural Australian Aboriginal communities. DESIGN: Cross-sectional population study. SETTING: Four Aboriginal communities in Queensland, the Northern Territory and South Australia, Australia. SUBJECTS: Data were collected from 1252 subjects aged 5-84 years in August 1990 and August/September 1991. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Respiratory symptoms, measured by interview-administered questionnaire; airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR), measured by histamine challenge; and allergy, measured by skin-pick tests. AHR was a PD20FEV1 of histamine of less than or equal to 3.9 mumol. RESULTS: The prevalence of AHR in the four communities ranged from 2.2% to 7.5% and significantly increased with age (chi 2 trend test: P < 0.05). The prevalence of current asthma was 0.5% among 8-12 year old children and 3.3% among adults. The overall prevalence of atopy in the four communities ranged from 21% to 34%. Allergy to cats, house dust mites or cigarette smoking was a risk factor for AHR, and cat allergy was a risk factor for current asthma. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of asthma in rural Aboriginal adults is low in comparison with the prevalence among non-Aboriginal Australians, and asthma in Aboriginal children is almost non-existent. The low prevalence of asthma is possibly due to environmental factors that influence the acquisition of atopy and AHR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Veale et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: