Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper examines the efficacy of some established techniques of plan evaluation by cost-benefit analysis. This particularly includes the applications to water resources development and the “balance sheet of development” as applied to urban planning. It is demonstrated that these techniques do not fully satisfy the requirements of the rational planning process. An alternative method of plan evaluation, known as the goals-achievement matrix, is postulated and is considered in terms of the requirements of the rational planning process.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Morris Hill (1968) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: