Why the study?
Does minimally invasive mitral repair with lateral pericardial incision reduce postoperative RV function decline compared to traditional sternotomy in patients with severe degenerative mitral regurgitation?
Does minimally invasive mitral repair with lateral pericardial incision reduce postoperative RV function decline compared to traditional sternotomy in patients with severe degenerative mitral regurgitation?
Minimally invasive mitral repair with a lateral pericardial approach may better preserve postoperative right ventricular longitudinal function compared to traditional sternotomy.
Different pericardial incisions or myocardial protections may influence postop RV recovery; leaves open optimal approach for prospective trials.
BACKGROUND: The reduction of RV function after cardiac surgery is a well-known phenomenon. It could persist up-to one year after the operation and often leads to an incomplete recovery at follow-up echocardiographic control. The aim of the present study is to analyze the impact of different modalities of pericardial incision (lateral versus anterior) and of myocardial protection protocols (Buckberg versus Custodiol) onto postoperative RV dynamic by relating two- and three-dimensional echocardiographic parameters in patients undergoing mitral valve repair through minimally invasive or traditional surgery approach. METHODS: We have analyzed 44 consecutive patients with severe degenerative mitral regurgitation who underwent mitral reparation with different surgical approach and cardioplegia type: Group 1 (17 pts): sternotomy with Buckberg cardioplegia protocol; Group 2 (10 pts): sternotomy with Custodiol cardioplegia; Group 3 (17 pts): mini-invasive surgery with Custodiol cardioplegia. Two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography was performed pre- and 6 months post-surgery to evaluate RV function by tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE). RESULTS: All patients underwent successful and uneventful. A postoperative TAPSE reduction was found in all groups. However, mini-invasive patients experienced a significant reduced variation versus traditional surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Mini-invasive mitral repair, with lateral incision of pericardium, reduces postoperative TAPSE fall, while cardioplegia protocol fails to have an impact onto longitudinal RV function. In our study, the RV seems to experience a clinically irrelevant geometrical modification too, whose entity appears to be less evident in case of lateral pericardial approach. These results could strengthen the use of minimally invasive approach also to preserve RV function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zanobini et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: