Why the study?
Does [44AANA47]-RANTES prevent progression of established atherosclerotic lesions in LDLr-/- mice?
Does [44AANA47]-RANTES prevent progression of established atherosclerotic lesions in LDLr-/- mice?
The RANTES antagonist [44AANA47]-RANTES limits the progression of established atherosclerosis and promotes a stable plaque phenotype in a mouse model.
Hypothesis-generating in LDLr-/- mice; human trials required before any clinical consideration.
BACKGROUND: Atherosclerosis is a chronic inflammatory disease that represents the primary cause of death through coronary disease and stroke. Chemokines are known to play a crucial role in this disease by recruiting inflammatory leukocytes to the endothelium. Recently, the chemokine variant [44AANA47]-RANTES was shown to impair inflammatory cell recruitment in vivo by interfering with heparin binding and oligomerization. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this study we report that curative treatment with [44AANA47]-RANTES limits atherosclerotic plaque formation in LDLr-/- mice. This was associated with reduced infiltration of T cells and macrophages and reduced production of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-9. By contrast, the relative smooth muscle cell and collagen content was increased, indicating a more stable plaque phenotype. In addition, we provide evidence for direct inhibition of leukocyte recruitment into aortic root lesions, attenuated leukocyte rolling and arrest in mesenteric vessels, as well as a reduced proinflammatory response following Con A stimulation in vitro. CONCLUSIONS: Interference with chemokine oligomerization and chemokine/heparin interactions is a powerful novel approach that inhibits progression of established atherosclerosis in mice. By inhibiting leukocyte recruitment into plaques, [44AANA47]-RANTES mediates a less inflammatory plaque phenotype and thus reduced systemic inflammatory state.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Braunersreuther et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: