Why the study?
Does bivalirudin alone improve efficacy and safety compared to unfractionated heparin plus a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention?
Does bivalirudin alone improve efficacy and safety compared to unfractionated heparin plus a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention?
This report reviews the 3-year outcomes of the HORIZONS-AMI trial comparing bivalirudin monotherapy to UFH plus GPI in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Review of 3-year HORIZONS-AMI data warrants no practice change; leaves open long-term bivalirudin role versus heparin plus GPI in STEMI PCI.
The combination of unfractionated heparin (UFH) plus glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPIs) has been a frequently used anti-thrombotic treatment strategy for acute coronary syndrome patients, including those with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. However, the ischemic benefit of the UFH plus GPI combination came at the expense of high rates of bleeding complications and thrombocytopenia, both of which have been independently associated with increased mortality. By contrast, bivalirudin monotherapy compared with the combination of UFH plus GPI resulted in improved net clinical outcomes, based on similar ischemic protection with significant reductions in bleeding complications in randomized trials including patients with stable angina, those with unstable angina and those with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. More recently, the HORIZONS-AMI randomized, open-label, multicenter trial has compared the efficacy and safety of bivalirudin alone versus UFH plus a GPI in 3602 patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Clinical results derived from this large study, including the final 3-year follow-up data, will be reviewed in the present clinical trial report.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Capranzano et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: