This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
The aim of this study was to explore participants' experiences and opinions about a free-choice system in relation to policy objectives articulated by the national government and local authorities. A case study was conducted. Thirty-five informants participated. Qualitative interviews were undertaken. Results are discussed on how to address different dimensions of choice, not only where, but also what, by whom, how much, and when. They also concern how to design systems that in some ways ensure predictability and continuity to avoid unwanted harm caused by the unpredictability embedded in competitive choice systems. Finally, different aspects of quality need to be addressed.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fjellfeldt et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: