Why the study?
mHealth solutions optimize cardiovascular risk factor control in coronary artery disease, but the influence of the AfterAMI mobile app on quality of life after myocardial infarction needed investigation.
Does the AfterAMI mobile app added to standard rehabilitation improve quality of life, depression, stress, and anxiety in patients after myocardial infarction?
Does the AfterAMI mobile app added to standard rehabilitation improve quality of life, depression, stress, and anxiety in patients after myocardial infarction?
The addition of a mobile health app to standard rehabilitation improves quality of life in patients after myocardial infarction.
Supports AfterAMI integration into post-MI rehab programs; extends RCT evidence for mHealth in CAD quality-of-life outcomes.
mHealth solutions optimize cardiovascular risk factor control in coronary artery disease. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of mobile app AfterAMI on quality of life in patients after myocardial infarction. 100 participants were randomized (1:1 ratio) into groups: (1) with a rehabilitation program and access to afterAMI or (2) standard rehabilitation alone (control group, CG). 3 questionnaires (MacNew, DASS21 and EQ-5D-5L) were used at baseline, 1 month and 6 months after discharge. Median age was 61 years; 35% of patients were female. At 1 month follow up patients using AfterAMI had higher general quality of life scores both in MacNew [5.78 vs. 5.5 in CG, p = 0.037] and EQ-5D-5L [80 vs. 70 in CG, p = 0.007]. At 6 months, according to MacNew, the app group had significantly higher scores in emotional [6.09 vs. 5.45 in CG, p= 0.017] and physical [6.2 vs. 6 in CG, p = 0.027] aspects. The general MacNew quality of life score was also higher in the AfterAMI group [6.11 vs. 5.7 in CG, p = 0.015], but differences in EQ-5D-5L were not significant. There were no differences between groups in the DASS21 questionnaire. mHealth interventions may improve quality of care in secondary prevention, however further studies are warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Boszko et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: