Why the study?
Cardiovascular and oncological diseases frequently co-occur, and while cardiotoxicity after antitumor therapy is well-studied, undeservedly little attention is paid in clinical practice to evaluating vasculotoxicity as an early predictor of microvascular damage.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This review emphasizes the need to evaluate vasculotoxicity as an early predictor of microvascular damage in patients undergoing anticancer therapy, expanding the focus beyond traditional cardiotoxicity.
Mortality from cardiovascular and oncological diseases has remained at record highs for many years. Clinicians pay attention to the frequent combination of these two pathologies. Naturally, the question arises, what unites seemingly different diseases among themselves? Modern cancer therapy has allowed many people to achieve a cure or a stable remission, but at the same time led to the appearance of cardiac pathology. The relationship between the development of cardiotoxic events after antitumor therapy has been well studied, but undeservedly little time is allocated in real clinical practice to study vasculotoxicity in patients. This approach can be considered as the earliest predictor of damage to the microvasculature as a result of specific therapy. The analysis of groups of anticancer drugs that cause chronic heart failure and damage to the vascular endothelium to the greatest extent was carried out. The main approaches to risk stratification in cardio-oncological patients are considered. The principles used in the prevention and treatment of cardio- and vasculotoxicity have been studied.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Хакуашева et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: