Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVES: Cotinine and 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanol (NNAL) are widely used biomarkers for tobacco-derived nicotine and the lung carcinogen 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone (NNK), respectively. The discrepancy between cotinine levels in relation to disease risk comparing active versus passive smoking suggests a nonlinear tobacco smoke dose-response and/or that cotinine is not providing an accurate measure of exposure to the toxic constituents of secondhand tobacco smoke. METHODS: Cotinine and NNAL were measured in the urine of 373 active smokers and 228 passive smokers. RESULTS: Average cotinine levels were 1,155 (interquartile range, 703-2,715) for active smokers and 1.82 (0.45-7.33) ng/mg creatinine for passive smokers. Average NNAL levels were 183 (103-393) and 5.19 (2.04-11.6) pg/mg creatinine, respectively. NNAL/cotinine ratio in urine was significantly higher for passive smokers when compared with active smokers (2.85 × 10(3) versus 0.16 × 10(3), P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Passive smoking is associated with a much higher ratio of NNAL/cotinine in the urine compared with active smoking. IMPACT: Cotinine measurement leads to an underestimation of exposure to the carcinogen NNK from secondhand smoke when compared with active smoking.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Benowitz et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: