This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
A bite mark case was received from the Eastern Cape for in the Department of Oral Pathology and Oral Biology. evidence included a photograph of a bite mark the left cheek of the victim, see Figure 1, two silicone of the bite mark and a set of study models of suspect’s dentition. Although the evidence proved to sufficient for analysis, the recommended protocol for collection of evidence was not followed.1 No American of Forensic Pathology (ABFO) rule or metric scale used during the photographic session and the impression extremely thin with no backing to maintain contours of the area bitten.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bernitz et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: