Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
cis -Dioxoruthenium(VI) complexes, [Cn*(CF 3 CO 2 )Ru VI O 2 ]ClO 4 ( 1 ) (Cn* = 1,4,7-trimethyl-1,4,7-triazacyclononane) and cis -[(Tet-Me 6 )Ru VI O 2 ](ClO 4 ) 2 ( 2 ) (Tet-Me 6 = N,N,N ‘,N ‘ -tetramethyl-3,6-dimethyl-3,6-diazaoctane-1,8-diamine), oxidize disubstituted alkynes to 1,2-diketones selectively in good to excellent yields under ambient conditions. The reactions proceed via the formation of dark blue intermediates, which display a characteristic UV−visible absorption band at 550−680 nm. With bis(trimethylsilyl)acetylene as substrate and 1 as the oxidant, the intermediate was isolated and structurally characterized by X-ray crystallography as a [3 + 2] cycloadduct. The kinetics of the cycloaddition of 1 with various substituted trimethylsilylacetylenes has been studied by stopped-flow spectrophotometry. With the exception of bis(trimethylsilyl)acetylene, the second-order rate constants were found to vary over a range of less than an order of magnitude irrespective of a 2.3 eV change of the calculated I p of the alkynes; therefore, a rate-limiting single electron-transfer mechanism is unlikely. The participation of oxirene (oxene insertion) and metallaoxetene ([2 + 2] cycloaddition) intermediates appears to be implausible based on product analysis. A linear Hammett correlation was established using σ + and σ JJ • parameters for the cycloaddition of 1 with para-substituted aryl trimethylsilylacetylenes, and the rate-limiting vinyl radical intermediate formation is proposed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Che et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: