Why the study?
Does a psychotherapeutic intervention addressed to reduce the meta-emotional problem reduce physiological fear response in phobic participants?
Does a psychotherapeutic intervention addressed to reduce the meta-emotional problem reduce physiological fear response in phobic participants?
Targeting the secondary meta-emotional problem in phobics can effectively reduce physiological fear responses, such as heart rate, during exposure.
Targeting meta-emotions may enhance phobia exposure outcomes; leaves open whether benefits generalize beyond this small exploratory sample.
Anxiety disorders may not only be characterized by specific symptomatology (e.g., tachycardia) in response to the fearful stimulus (primary problem or first-level emotion) but also by the tendency to negatively evaluate oneself for having those symptoms (secondary problem or negative meta-emotion). An exploratory study was conducted driven by the hypothesis that reducing the secondary or meta-emotional problem would also diminish the fear response to the phobic stimulus. Thirty-three phobic participants were exposed to the phobic target before and after undergoing a psychotherapeutic intervention addressed to reduce the meta-emotional problem or a control condition. The electrocardiogram was continuously recorded to derive heart rate (HR) and heart rate variability (HRV) and affect ratings were obtained. Addressing the meta-emotional problem had the effect of reducing the physiological but not the subjective symptoms of anxiety after phobic exposure. Preliminary findings support the role of the meta-emotional problem in the maintenance of response to the fearful stimulus (primary problem).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Couyoumdjian et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: