Why the study?
Can echocardiographically measured respiratory variation and/or absolute size of RVIDd or LVIDd accurately indicate the presence or severity of cardiac tamponade?
Can echocardiographically measured respiratory variation and/or absolute size of RVIDd or LVIDd accurately indicate the presence or severity of cardiac tamponade?
A single echocardiogram cannot accurately predict the presence or severity of cardiac tamponade, though serial echocardiograms showing progressive changes may raise suspicion.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Single echocardiographic assessment cannot reliably indicate tamponade presence or severity; leaves open whether serial changes aid diagnosis in humans.
The purpose of this study was to determine if respiratory variation and/or absolute size of echocardiographically measured right or left ventricular internal dimension at end-diastole (RVIDd or LIVIDd) are accurate indicators of the presence or severity of cardiac tamponade. We measured RVIDd or LVIDd by echocardiography in nine closed-chest, spontaneously breathing dogs in control and during hypotensive tamponade. With tamponade, the end-expiratory RVIDd and LVIDd were significantly smaller than control. Inspiratory increases in RVIDd and decreases in LVIDd were exaggerated during tamponade. Because of the wide range and overlap of RVIDd and LVIDd, no single expiratory value or amount of respiratory change indicated the presence or severity of tamponade. We conclude that if serial echocardiograms show a pericardial effusion, a decreasing end-expiratory RVIDd and LVIDd and an increasing percentage change in ventricular diameter with inspiration, a progressive degree of tamponade should be suspected However, a single echocardiogram cannot accurately predict the presence or severity of tamponade.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Martins et al. (1979) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: