Why the study?
The authors sought to analyse potential associations between computed tomography time to threshold, circulatory state, and prognosis in patients with acute pulmonary embolism.
Does time to threshold (TTT) during CTPA correlate with circulatory state and 30-day survival in patients with acute pulmonary embolism?
Does time to threshold (TTT) during CTPA correlate with circulatory state and 30-day survival in patients with acute pulmonary embolism?
Time to threshold during CTPA does not correlate with clinical prognosis scores or survival in acute pulmonary embolism, limiting its utility for risk stratification.
TTT may aid PE risk stratification; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
INTRODUCTION: Bolus tracking is applied in computed tomography pulmonary angiography. The time that it takes for contrast to reach a predefined threshold in the pulmonary artery is called time to threshold (TTT). Our purpose was to analyse possible associations between TTT and circulatory state and prognosis in patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE). METHODS: In a single-centre, retrospective study 138 patients with PE and contrast administration via peripheral venous line were included. Clinical parameters of circulatory state were arterial pH, systolic blood pressure, heart rate, sPESI score, Wells score and GENEVA score. Survival was defined as surviving the following 30 days after the PE diagnosis. RESULTS: Time to threshold was only weakly correlated with Fi02 (r = 0.26, P = 0.04), pH (r = -0.22, P = 0.009), venous base excess (r = -0.18, P = 0.04) and venous lactate (r = 0.21, P = 0.01). TTT did not correlate with clinical parameters/scores and mortality. There were weak associations between TTT and blood gas analysis parameters. There were no associations with clinically relevant prognosis scores and overall survival. CONCLUSION: Therefore, albeit TTT is an easily assessable parameter of CTPA, the potential use in clinical routine is limited for prognosis stratification in patients with PE.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Meyer et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: