Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In vitro study demonstrates c-kit inhibition and apoptosis induction by SU5416 and SU6668 in acute myeloid leukemia cells, suggesting a dual antiangiogenic therapeutic strategy.
SU5416 and SU6668 are potent antiangiogenic small-molecule inhibitors of receptor tyrosine kinases, including those of the vascular endothelial growth factor and platelet-derived growth factor receptor families. The stem cell factor (SCF) receptor, c-kit, is structurally related to these receptors and, although not expressed on mature peripheral blood cells, is expressed in leukemic blasts derived from 60% to 80% of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients. The c-kit kinase inhibitory activity of SU5416 and SU6668 was evaluated in MO7E cells, a human myeloid leukemia cell line. Tyrosine autophosphorylation of the receptor, induced by SCF, was inhibited in these cells by SU5416 and SU6668 in a dose-dependent manner (inhibitory concentration of 50% [IC(50)] 0.1-1 microM). Inhibition of extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2) phosphorylation, a signaling event downstream of c-kit activation, was also inhibited in a dose-dependent manner. Both compounds also inhibited SCF-induced proliferation of MO7E cells (IC(50) 0.1 microM for SU5416; 0.29 microM for SU6668). Furthermore, both SU5416 and SU6668 induced apoptosis in a dose- and time-dependent manner as measured by the increase in activated caspase-3 and the enhanced cleavage of its substrate poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase. These findings with MO7E cells were extended to leukemic blasts from c-kit(+) patients. In patient blasts, both SU5416 and SU6668 inhibited SCF-induced phosphorylation of c-kit and ERK1/2 and induced apoptosis. These studies indicate that SU5416 and SU6668 inhibit biologic functions of c-kit in addition to exhibiting antiangiogenic properties and suggest that the combination of these activities may provide a novel therapeutic approach for the treatment of AML.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Smolich et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: