Why the study?
Blood lipids disorder and atherosclerosis are closely related to CAD, prompting a comparison of different blood lipid parameters combined with cIMT in predicting CAD.
Does Lp(a) combined with cIMT improve the prediction of CAD in patients with highly suspected CAD?
Does Lp(a) combined with cIMT improve the prediction of CAD in patients with highly suspected CAD?
Lp(a) combined with carotid intima-media thickness provides superior predictive value for the presence and severity of CAD compared to other lipid indices.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support lipid-cIMT combos for CAD prediction; hypothesis-generating in retrospective data, needs prospective validation.
Background: Blood lipids disorder and atherosclerosis are closely related to coronary artery disease (CAD). This study aims to compare different blood lipid parameters combined with carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) in predicting CAD. Methods: This was a retrospective study including patients who underwent coronary angiography for highly suspected CAD. Blood samples were taken for lipid profile analysis and cIMT was evaluated by carotid ultrasound. Logistic analysis was used to establish different models of different lipid parameters in predicting CAD. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to examine the predictive value. The optimal lipid parameter was also used to explore the relationship with multi-vessel CAD. Results: Patients were classified into two groups based on whether CAD existed. There was no difference in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) between the two groups. Compared with non-CAD patients, the CAD group had higher lipoprotein (a) (Lp (a)), apolipoprotein B/apolipoprotein A, total cholesterol/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), triglyceride/HDL-C and LDL-C/HDL-C. According to the AUCs, Lp (a) combined with cIMT (AUC: 0.713, P < 0.001) had the best performance in predicting CAD compared to other lipid parameters. High levels of Lp (a) was also associated with multi-vessel CAD (odds ratio: 1.41, 95% confidence interval: 1.02–1.95, P = 0.036). Conclusion: For patients with highly suspected CAD, Lp (a) better improved the predictive value of CAD rather than most of blood lipid indices, especially in the absence of high levels of LDL-C. Lp (a) also can be used to predict the multi-vessel CAD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hu et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: