Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The clinical outcomes of adult-acquired acute infection of hepatitis C virus (HCV) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) are quite different. In order to compare the clinical, biochemical, virologic and pathologic pictures in these two groups of patients, we enrolled 22 adult patients with acute hepatitis C and 16 adult patients with acute hepatitis B, on whom liver biopsies were performed within 3 months of acute onset of the illness. RESULTS: The results showed that a significantly younger age, a higher ratio of the clinical symptoms of jaundice, nausea, vomiting, and poor appetite, a higher mean serum level of alanine transaminase, aspartate transaminase, and total bilirubin were present in patients with acute hepatitis B patients than in those with acute hepatitis C (P < 0.05). There was a significantly higher degree of periportal inflammation and total necro-inflammatory activity in the acute hepatitis B patients (P = 0.002 and 0.049, respectively). Fifteen (68.2%) of the 22 patients with acute hepatitis C had detectable serum HCV-RNA, but only two (14.3%) of the 14 tested patients with acute hepatitis B had detectable serum HBV-DNA, detected by using the branched DNA signal amplification assay. Eighteen (82%) of the 22 acute hepatitis C patients and none of the 16 acute hepatitis B patients progressed into a chronic hepatitis stage (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The manifestations of mild clinical symptoms, lower mean serum transaminases and bilirubin levels, a lesser degree of histological periportal necroinflammation, and more patients with a high circulatory viral load among the acute hepatitis C patients, may lead to more of that group developing chronicity than patients with acute hepatitis B.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chu et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: