Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: Because of its anatomical and physiological similarities to humans, the pig appears to be a suitable large animal model for preclinical studies of islet transplantation. The aim of this study was to investigate islet auto- and allotransplantation in a pig model with diabetes induced by total pancreatectomy. METHODS: Porcine islets were isolated by a continuous digestion-filtration device at 32 degrees C and purified by a discontinuous iso-osmolar Ficoll-sodium-diatrizoate gradient on a Cobe 2991. The purified islets were autografted into the liver or the renal subcapsular space. The liver appears to be a more suitable site for the islet grafts than the renal subcapsular space, and the minimal amount of islets for reversal of diabetes is >5 microl/kg of body weight. RESULTS: Persistent normoglycemia (fasting blood glucose level: 72.4+/-44.38 mg/dl) with a normal insulin secretion response to glucose stimulation was successfully achieved in five of six diabetic pigs by implanting a sufficient islet mass into the liver. Triple-drug immunosuppressive therapy with cyclosporine, azathioprine, and prednisolone did not prevent porcine islet allografts from experiencing early failure. However, the addition of 15-deoxyspergualin to the triple-drug immunosuppressive regimen significantly prolonged the function of the islet allografts. When antithymocyte globulin was added to the above-mentioned immunosuppressive drug regimen, the normoglycemic period was prolonged to more than 1 month (fasting blood glucose level: 75.4+/-17 mg/dl). CONCLUSION: We conclude that autotransplantation with a sufficient islet mass can induce normoglycemia with a normal insulin secretion response to glucose stimulation in pancreatectomized diabetic pigs and that allotransplantation can be successfully achieved when 15-deoxyspergualin and antithymocyte globulin are combined with the triple-drug immunosuppression described above. However, this immunosuppressive protocol results in a high rate of infectious complications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mellert et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: