Why the study?
Does a high-calorie-expenditure exercise program improve quality of life and psychosocial variables compared to standard cardiac rehabilitation in overweight older adults with coronary heart disease?
Does a high-calorie-expenditure exercise program improve quality of life and psychosocial variables compared to standard cardiac rehabilitation in overweight older adults with coronary heart disease?
A high-calorie-expenditure exercise program is safe, acceptable, and yields greater weight loss and quality of life improvements than standard cardiac rehabilitation in overweight older adults with coronary heart disease.
Favors high-calorie-expenditure exercise over standard cardiac rehabilitation for greater weight loss and functioning in overweight older adults with CHD; extends evidence on exercise dosing.
The acceptability of a high-calorie-expenditure (HCE) exercise program in older coronary heart disease patients participating in a behavioral weight-control program was evaluated. Seventy-four overweight patients (median age 63 yr) were randomly assigned to a 5-mo intervention of HCE exercise (3,000-3,500 kcal/wk daily walking) or standard cardiac-rehabilitation (CR) exercise (700-800 kcal/wk). Both groups received counseling to achieve a dietary caloric deficit of 3,500 kcal/ wk. Assessments at baseline and 5 mo included self-reported measures of quality of life and psychosocial variables. The HCE group experienced significantly greater weight loss (8.2 ± 4 vs. 3.7 ± 5 kg, p < .001). Changes from baseline to 5 mo on scores of physical, emotional, and social functioning were greater for the HCE than CR group (p < .05). HCE exercise also resulted in greater positive change in exercise enjoyment (p = .05), which was mediated by weight change. Even high-risk older adults can be successful in an HCE exercise program and experience no adverse physical or emotional changes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pope et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: