Why the study?
The efficiency of a fixed daily dose enoxaparin (40 mg) thromboprophylaxis strategy had not been sufficiently evaluated in patients undergoing inpatient rehabilitation.
Does fixed daily dose enoxaparin (40 mg) achieve effective antithrombotic activity (anti-Xa 0.2-0.5 U/ml) in patients undergoing inpatient rehabilitation?
Does fixed daily dose enoxaparin (40 mg) achieve effective antithrombotic activity (anti-Xa 0.2-0.5 U/ml) in patients undergoing inpatient rehabilitation?
A fixed 40 mg daily dose of enoxaparin for VTE prophylaxis in rehabilitation patients may be inadequate for some, as anti-Xa levels inversely correlate with weight and renal function, suggesting a need for dose adjustments.
May support anti-Xa monitoring in SAIS/SCI rehab; leaves open optimal fixed-dose enoxaparin strategy.
Background . We aimed to examine the efficiency of fixed daily dose enoxaparin (40 mg) thromboprophylaxis strategy for patients undergoing inpatient rehabilitation. Methods . This was an observational, prospective, cohort study that included 63 hospitalized patients undergoing rehabilitative treatment following sub-acute ischemic stroke (SAIS) or spinal cord injury (SCI), with an indication for thromboprophylaxis. Anti-Xa level measured three hours post-drug administration (following three consecutive days of enoxaparin treatment or more) was utilised to assess in vivo enoxaparin activity. An anti-Xa level between 0.2–0.5 U/ml was considered evidence of effective antithrombotic activity. Results . We found sub-prophylactic levels of anti-Xa (< 0.2 U/ml) in 19% (12/63). Results were within the recommended prophylactic range (0.2–0.5 U/ml) in 73% (46/63) and were supra-prophylactic (> 0.5 U/ml) in 7.9% (5/63) of patients. Anti-Xa levels were found to inversely correlate with patients’ weight and renal function as defined by creatinine clearance (CrCl) (p < 0.05). Conclusions . Our study confirmed that a one-size-fits-all approach for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis may be inadequate for rehabilitation patient populations. The efficacy of fixed-dose enoxaparin prophylaxis is limited and may be influenced by renal function and weight. This study suggests that anti-Xa studies and prophylactic enoxaparin dose adjustments should be considered in certain patients, such as those who are underweight, overweight and or have suboptimal renal function. Trial Registration . No. NCT103593291, registered August 2018.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Haim et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: