The academic literature has generally found the effect of money on election outcomes to be marginal. This is likely because they have looked in the wrong places. The literature has yet to examine the effects of early fundraising on election outcomes in partisan primaries, which are increasingly where candidates are being selected. This article investigates both the determinants and effects of early fundraising on candidate selection. It finds that professional networks strongly influence early fundraising outcomes, which in turn advantages candidates from certain professions—particularly lawyers. Given the findings, I discuss the implications for reform and propose funding political scholarships as a mechanism to correct for representational imbalances.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Adam Bonica (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: