Why the study?
MINOCA is more common in NSTEMI, and microvascular coronary dysfunction plays an important etiopathogenic role, prompting evaluation of CMR as a non-invasive assessment tool.
Does CMR help evaluate microvascular coronary dysfunction and diagnose the etiology of MINOCA in patients with NSTEMI?
Does CMR help evaluate microvascular coronary dysfunction and diagnose the etiology of MINOCA in patients with NSTEMI?
CMR is a valuable non-invasive tool for differentiating coronary from non-coronary etiologies in patients with MINOCA and NSTEMI based on fibrosis patterns.
CMR aids MINOCA etiology and DCM assessment in NSTEMI; leaves open routine adoption pending larger validation studies.
Myocardial infarction without coronary artery obstruction (MINOCA) is 3 times more common in patients with NSTEMI compared to STEMI. The potential etiology of MINOCA can be divided in coronary and non-coronary causes. At the same time, an important role in its etiopathogenesis is played by microvascular coronary dysfunction (DCM). The aim of the study is to assess the feasibility of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) as a non-invasive method of evaluating DCM in patients with NSTEMI and in addition, to verify the substrate of MINOCA according to CMR. A diagnostic examination was carried out in 16 patients, of which coronary etiology was confirmed only in 1/3, the rest of the patients had a non-coronary etiology of the disease (myocarditis, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and dilated cardiomyopathy). Microvascular coronary dysfunction (CDM) was determined in 30% of patients with non-coronary impairment (group I) and in 50% of those with coronary heart disease (group II) (χ² = 0.64, p> 0.05). Significant differences between groups were observed in the localization of fibrosis, so in group II, according to CMR, all patients had subendocardial fibrosis - 100%, while in group I, intramural fibrosis prevailed in 50% (n = 5), subepicardial fibrosis - 20% (n = 2) and in 20% (n = 2) both types of contrast enhancement were noted, χ² = 12.44 p < 0.05. In conclusion, CMR is an important diagnostic tool both in assessing the causes of MINOCA and in evaluating DCM in this category of patients. However, further studies are needed to improve the diagnostic accuracy of this method in the study of coronary microcirculation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dicusar et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: