Why the study?
Does preoperative and intraoperative echocardiography effectively detect right-to-left shunting in patients undergoing neurosurgical procedures in the sitting position?
Does preoperative and intraoperative echocardiography effectively detect right-to-left shunting in patients undergoing neurosurgical procedures in the sitting position?
Preoperative echocardiography has limited usefulness as a screening test for PFO in patients undergoing neurosurgical procedures in the sitting position due to a lower-than-expected detection rate.
Echocardiography detected fewer right-to-left shunts than expected; leaves open its reliability for preoperative screening before sitting neurosurgery.
In patients undergoing neurosurgical procedures at high risk for venous air embolism (VAE), the presence of a right-to-left shunt adds an additional risk for paradoxical air embolism (PAE). Although this is a rare complication, it can have devastating results. The most common form of right-to-left shunt is a patient foramen ovale (PFO), which can be detected by contrast echocardiography. This study evaluates the efficacy of preoperative precordial and intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) to detect right-to-left shunting in patients undergoing neurosurgical procedures while in the sitting position. In 101 patients precordial contrast echocardiography was performed prior to surgery. The Valsalva maneuver was utilized as a provocative maneuver to facilitate demonstration of right-to-left shunting. Fifty-one of these patients also had intraoperative TEE monitoring. Right-to-left shunting was demonstrated in only six of the 101 patients examined. Of these, four were detected by TEE. This is less than the expected incidence based on the known incidence of PFO in the general population. The usefulness of preoperative ECHO as a screening test for PFO in patients undergoing neurosurgical procedures is limited, but when a PFO is found, valuable information is acquired to help manage these patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Black et al. (1990) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: