Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
spectra, pore size distribution, two-dimensional relaxation distribution, and pore fractal dimensions of coal samples were investigated. The results indicate that after heat treatment, the porosity of coal samples across all coal ranks increased, with low-rank coal exhibiting the greatest increase, suggesting that low-rank coal pore structures possess the strongest temperature sensitivity. When the temperature reached 300 °C, the porosity of high-rank coal began to increase significantly, suggesting that its pore structure requires a higher activation temperature for thermal evolution. The DHB coal sample exhibited caking properties, and significant thermal expansion of the coal matrix after heating led to a smaller porosity at 300 °C compared to ZJM and SH samples. Heat treatment promoted the transformation of micropores into mesopores and macropores. Low-rank coal was characterized by an increase in mesopore volume, the pore connectivity of medium-rank coal was optimized, and the macropore volume of high-rank coal increased markedly with rising temperature. After heat treatment, the fractal dimensions of mesopores and macropores generally decreased, indicating reduced pore surface irregularity and enhanced connectivity, which facilitates fluid seepage. This study reveals the thermophysical differential response patterns of pores in coals of different ranks. Heat treatment affects coal pores though expansion, increase in number, and improved connectivity, creating favorable conditions for the fluid product during thermal extraction. The research findings provide theoretical and parametric support for geological site selection and process control of thermal mining, thereby promoting the development of thermal extraction technologies for coal resources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: