Key result
Retrospective Canadian Neurological Scale scoring reliably predicts 30-day and 1-year mortality.
Observational (n=181)
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: Stroke severity is an important determinant of outcome, however, quantitative data on the initial neurological status might be lacking in retrospective studies. We wanted to assess the reliability and validity of the retrospective use of the Canadian Neurological Scale (CNS). METHODS: In 181 patients with validated stroke, two raters scored the CNS based on medical record review. We assessed interrater reliability and construct validity of the CNS. Predictive validity was assessed by the ability of the CNS to predict 30-day and 1-year mortality. RESULTS: Interrater reliability was high (kappa or weighted kappa 0.76-0.96). Correlations between similar items of prospective Scandinavian Stroke Scale scores and retrospective CNS scores ranged from 0.54 to 0.85. CNS total score was a strong predictor of death within 30 days and 1 year in multivariate models. CONCLUSIONS: The retrospective algorithm for the CNS had a high to substantial interrater reliability and predictive validity. Accordingly, in retrospective stroke studies using medical record information, the CNS can be a feasible instrument to adjust for differences in stroke severity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stavem et al. (2003) conducted an observational in Stroke (n=181). Retrospective Canadian Neurological Scale (CNS) scoring vs. Prospective Scandinavian Stroke Scale scores was evaluated on Interrater reliability, construct validity, and predictive validity for 30-day and 1-year mortality (Kappa 0.76-0.96). Retrospective Canadian Neurological Scale scoring demonstrated high interrater reliability (kappa 0.76-0.96), good correlation (0.54-0.85), and predicted 30-day and 1-year mortality.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: