Why the study?
Does Fabry disease impair myocardial perfusion reserve and peripheral endothelial function compared to healthy controls?
Does Fabry disease impair myocardial perfusion reserve and peripheral endothelial function compared to healthy controls?
Patients with Fabry disease demonstrate impaired myocardial perfusion reserve despite preserved peripheral endothelial function, suggesting early and specific cardiac microvascular involvement.
Suggests early cardiac microvascular involvement in Fabry disease; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
Fabry disease (McKusick 301500) is an X-linked lysosomal storage disorder due to deficient alpha-galactosidase A activity, which leads to accumulation of glycosphingolipids, especially in vascular smooth-muscle and endothelial cells. The effect of this accumulation on peripheral and cardiac vascular function is poorly known. We studied 15 Fabry patients (mean age 35 years and mean BMI 24.8 kg/m2) and 30 age- and BMI-matched healthy controls to examine whether myocardial perfusion reserve and peripheral artery endothelial function are altered. Myocardial perfusion was measured at rest and during dipyridamole-induced hyperaemia by positron emission tomography and H2(15)O. Myocardial blood flow reserve was calculated as the ratio between the dipyridamole-induced maximal blood flow and resting blood flow. Peripheral artery endothelial function was assessed by measuring the brachial artery flow-mediated dilatation using ultrasound at rest and during reactive hyperaemia. The myocardial perfusion reserve was significantly lower in Fabry patients than in controls (3.3+/-1.2 vs 4.4+/-1.6, p=0.02), while the brachial artery flow-mediated dilatation was similar (5.9%+/-3.9% vs 4.5%+/-3.6%, p=0.27). Thus, inFabry disease, myocardial perfusion reserve is reduced while the peripheral artery endothelial function is preserved.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kalliokoski et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: