Does deep-learning based real-time cardiac cine imaging in free breathing provide comparable image quality and volumetric results to breath-hold imaging in healthy volunteers?
Deep-learning based real-time cardiac cine imaging in free breathing is feasible, reducing acquisition time by 50% while maintaining acceptable volumetric results and image quality compared to breath-hold sequences.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate deep-learning (DL) based real-time cardiac cine sequences acquired in free breathing (FB) vs breath hold (BH). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective single-centre cohort study, 56 healthy adult volunteers were investigated on a 1.5-T MRI scanner. A set of real-time cine sequences, including a short-axis stack, 2-, 3-, and 4-chamber views, was acquired in FB and with BH. A validated DL-based cine sequence acquired over three cardiac cycles served as the reference standard for volumetric results. Subjective image quality (sIQ) was rated by two blinded readers. Volumetric analysis of both ventricles was performed. RESULTS: sIQ was rated as good to excellent for FB real-time cine images, slightly inferior to BH real-time cine images (p 0.90 for all parameters except right ventricular ejection fraction (RV EF, ICC = 0.887). With FB cine imaging, correlation with the reference standard was good for LV ejection fraction (LV EF, ICC = 0.825) and RV EF (ICC = 0.824) and excellent (ICC > 0.90) for all other parameters. CONCLUSION: DL-based real-time cine imaging is feasible even in FB with good to excellent image quality and acceptable volumetric results in healthy volunteers. KEY POINTS: Question Conventional cardiac MR (CMR) cine imaging is challenged by arrhythmias and patients unable to hold their breath, since data is acquired over several heartbeats. Findings DL-based real-time cine imaging is feasible in FB with acceptable volumetric results and reduced acquisition time by 50% compared to real-time breath-hold sequences. Clinical relevance This study fits into the wider goal of increasing the availability of CMR by reducing the complexity, duration of the examination and improving patient comfort and making CMR available even for patients who are unable to hold their breath.
Klemenz et al. (Sat,) studied this question.