Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Bleed off-take air pressure and the interaction of the off-take with the primary flow through the blade passage is determined by: (1) the location of the bleed off-take at the endwall relative to the blade passage; (2) the bleed flow rate; and (3) the off-take geometry. In the companion paper (Leishman et al., 2007, ASME J. Turbomach., 129, pp. 645–658) the effect of bleed rate and endwall location was investigated using a circular hole bleed off-take configuration; the circular hole was tested at three endwall locations and for bleed flow rates between 0% and 9% of the primary (core) flow through the blade passage. The effects of bleed off-take geometry are presented in this paper by comparing the aerodynamic behavior of a number of generic bleed off-take configurations. Using results from low-speed cascade experiments and three-dimensional numerical calculations, the off-take configurations are compared with respect to the requirement to maximize bleed off-take air pressure and minimize loss generated within the blade passage. The off-take geometry, and especially the introduction of contoured inlet ramp surfaces to guide flow into the off-take for high bleed pressure, has a strong effect on its aerodynamic behavior because it determines the extent to which flow within the off-take is coupled to the primary flow through the blade passage. In this paper, the off-take configurations that give the highest bleed pressure generally cause the highest levels of loss in the blade passage.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Leishman et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: