Why the study?
Peri-operative cardiovascular events occur in up to 3% of patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery, making accurate cardiovascular risk assessment important to guide decisions, surgical approaches, preventive medications, and post-operative monitoring.
Pre-operative cardiovascular risk assessment should focus on clinical evaluation and functional capacity, while routine pre-operative revascularization is not recommended.
Peri-operative CV risk assessment informs shared decisions; leaves open optimal quantitative tools for routine Australian practice.
Peri-operative cardiovascular events occur in up to 3% of patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery. Accurate cardiovascular risk assessment is important in the peri-operative setting, as it allows informed and shared decisions regarding the appropriateness of proceeding with surgery, guides surgical and anaesthetic approaches, and may influence the use of preventive medications and post-operative cardiac monitoring. Quantitative risk assessment may also inform a reconsideration of choosing a more limited lower risk type of surgery, or conservative management. Pre-operative cardiovascular risk assessment starts with clinical assessment and should include an estimate of functional capacity. Specialised cardiac investigations are rarely indicated specifically to assess pre-operative cardiovascular risk. The decision regarding cardiac investigations is influenced by the nature, extent and urgency of surgery. The strategy of performing pre-operative revascularisation to improve post-operative outcomes is not evidence-based and recent international guidelines recommend against this.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mahendran et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: