Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This review provides a comprehensive analysis of perioperative cardiovascular risk assessment for noncardiac surgeries to guide clinical decision-making.
Surgical management of disease has a tremendous impact on our health system. Millions of people worldwide undergo surgeries every year. Cardiovascular complications in the perioperative period are one of the most common events leading to increased morbidity and mortality. Although such events are very small in number, they are associated with a high mortality rate making it essential for physicians to understand the importance of perioperative cardiovascular risk assessment and evaluation. Its involves a detailed process of history taking, patient's medical profile, medications being used, functional status of the patient, and knowledge about the surgical procedure and its inherent risks. Different risk assessment tools and calculators have also been developed to aid in this process, each with their own advantages and limitations. After such a comprehensive evaluation, a physician will be able to provide a risk assessment or it may all lead to further testing if it is believed that a change in management after such testing will help to reduce perioperative morbidity and mortality. There is extensive literature on the significance of multiple perioperative testing modalities and how they can change management. The purpose of our review is to provide a concise but comprehensive analysis on all such aspects of perioperative cardiovascular risk assessment for noncardiac surgeries and provide a basic methodology toward such assessment and decision making.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rafiq et al. (2017) conducted a review in Perioperative cardiovascular risk in noncardiac surgery. Perioperative cardiovascular risk assessment was evaluated.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: