Why the study?
To facilitate clinical acceptance of machine learning methodologies in cardiac arrhythmia and electrophysiology, promoting general knowledge and highlighting areas of successful application are needed.
Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Design
Primer review
Machine learning applications in electrophysiology remain exploratory; leaves open prospective validation before clinical integration.
Artificial intelligence has become ubiquitous. Machine learning, a branch of artificial intelligence, leads the current technological revolution through its remarkable ability to learn and perform on data sets of varying types. Machine learning applications are expected to change contemporary medicine as they are brought into mainstream clinical practice. In the field of cardiac arrhythmia and electrophysiology, machine learning applications have enjoyed rapid growth and popularity. To facilitate clinical acceptance of these methodologies, it is important to promote general knowledge of machine learning in the wider community and continue to highlight the areas of successful application. The authors present a primer to provide an overview of common supervised (least squares, support vector machine, neural networks and random forest) and unsupervised (k-means and principal component analysis) machine learning models. The authors also provide explanations as to how and why the specific machine learning models have been used in arrhythmia and electrophysiology studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Loeffler et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: