Why the study?
Rhinoviruses constitute a substantial public health burden, prompting an evaluation of their abundance, genetic diversity, and clinical significance in adult patients.
What is the molecular epidemiology and clinical significance of human rhinoviruses in adult patients?
What is the molecular epidemiology and clinical significance of human rhinoviruses in adult patients?
Adult rhinovirus infections exhibit high genetic diversity, and while specific RV species do not correlate with clinical presentation, co-infections significantly worsen clinical outcomes such as hospital length of stay and pneumonia.
RV co-infections may worsen adult respiratory illness; leaves open genotype-specific risks in observational data.
Rhinoviruses (RVs) constitute a substantial public health burden. To evaluate their abundance and genetic diversity in adult patients, RV RNA in respiratory samples was assessed using real-time RT-PCR and the partial nucleic acid sequencing of viral genomes. Additionally, clinical data were retrieved from patient charts to determine the clinical significance of adult RV infections. In total, the respiratory specimens of 284 adult patients (18–90 years), collected from 2013 to 2017, were analyzed. Infections occurred throughout the entire year, with peaks occurring in fall and winter, and showed a remarkably high intra- and interseasonal diversity of RV genotypes. RV species were detected in the following ratios: 60.9% RV-A 173, 12.7% RV-B, and 26.4% RV-C. No correlations between RV species and underlying comorbidities such as asthma (p = 0.167), COPD (p = 0.312) or immunosuppression (p = 0.824) were found. However, 21.1% of the patients had co-infections with other pathogens, which were associated with a longer hospital stay (p = 0.024), LRTI (p < 0.001), and pneumonia (p = 0.01). Taken together, this study shows a pronounced genetic diversity of RV in adults and underlines the important role of co-infections. No correlation of specific RV species with a particular clinical presentation could be deduced.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Golke et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: