Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Summary The current quest for a common core arises ostensibly out of the expansion and diversification of the curriculum in recent years. Some hundred years ago, schools in London followed the London Board syllabus drawn up by a committee chaired by Professor T. H. Huxley. This laid down a compulsory and a voluntary curriculum; the former had to be covered in all schools, the latter was pursued at the direction of school managers. Little chance of the ‘unacceptable variety’ or ‘patchwork curriculum’ noted by HMI in their working papers Curriculum 11‐16 (DES, 1977(a)). In this paper we first examine some of the concepts associated with, and questions arising from, the phrase ‘common core curriculum’, and then consider the present practice of schools, particularly in the two years immediately preceding statutory leaving age when a range of options is commonly provided as well as a compulsory ‘core’ curriculum. The paper concludes that a question of major importance in the present system concerns the procedu...
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Margaret I. Reid (1979) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: