Why the study?
Does the baseline ECG ST-segment pattern predict 90-day mortality and aetiology in patients with cardiogenic shock?
Does the baseline ECG ST-segment pattern predict 90-day mortality and aetiology in patients with cardiogenic shock?
Baseline ST-segment elevation on ECG is associated with acute coronary syndrome aetiology and predicts higher 90-day mortality in unselected patients with cardiogenic shock.
Background The most common aetiology of cardiogenic shock (CS) is acute coronary syndrome (ACS), but even up to 20%–50% of CS is caused by other disorders. ST‐segment deviations in the electrocardiogram (ECG) have been investigated in patients with ACS‐related CS, but not in those with other CS aetiologies. We set out to explore the prevalence of different ST‐segment patterns and their associations with the CS aetiology, clinical findings and 90‐day mortality. Methods We analysed the baseline ECG of 196 patients who were included in a multinational prospective study of CS. The patients were divided into 3 groups: (a) ST‐segment elevation (STE). (b) ST‐segment depression (STDEP). (c) No ST‐segment deviation or ST‐segment impossible to analyse (NSTD). A subgroup analysis of the ACS patients was conducted. Results ST‐segment deviations were present in 80% of the patients: 52% had STE and 29% had STDEP. STE was associated with the ACS aetiology, but one‐fourth of the STDEP patients had aetiology other than ACS. The overall 90‐day mortality was 41%: in STE 47%, STDEP 36% and NSTD 33%. In the multivariate mortality analysis, only STE predicted mortality (HR 1.74, CI 95 1.07–2.84). In the ACS subgroup, the patients were equally effectively revascularized, and no differences in the survival were noted between the study groups. Conclusion ST‐segment elevation is associated with the ACS aetiology and high mortality in the unselected CS population. If STE is not present, other aetiologies must be considered. When effectively revascularized, the prognosis is similar regardless of the ST‐segment pattern in ACS‐related CS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Javanainen et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: